Any adaptation process must be viewed from two opposing angles. On the one hand, during adaptation the subject of the adaptation process and the social environment are transformed, and on the other hand, they strive for self-preservation. The adaptive situation involves protective mechanisms that prevent changes, i.e. adaptation barriers arise. And these barriers can be erected by any of the interacting parties.
For the subject of the adaptation process such barriers can be worldview, psychological state, limited information, ignorance of culture and traditions, etc.
The unwillingness of society to change under the influence of the subject can lead to both ignoring him and pushing him out of his environment.
In the context of the goals of higher education, social adaptation of a freshman means the ability to meet the requirements and norms of the institution, as well as the ability to develop in the new environment, to realize his abilities and needs without coming into conflict with this environment.
The complexity of adaptation in the transition from general to vocational education is not only in the change of social environment, but also in the need to make a decision, the emergence of anxiety about the correctness of self-determination, which for many is identical to finding the meaning of life.
Many authors emphasize that socio-psychological adaptation is a process of active adaptation of the individual to the conditions of the social environment, as well as a result of this process (A.A. Rean, N.N. Melnikova, etc.).
So, in the course of socio-psychological adaptation both the purposes connected with adaptation to the social environment, and the purposes connected with self-expression, self-realization of the person and its active influence on the environment can be reached.
As for the essence of the processes and changes that occur during socio-psychological adaptation, most authors note that there is a process of harmonization of needs, mutual requirements and expectations of the person and the social environment (Ofitserkina, 1997; Rozum, 2006). The adapting subject assimilates the norms, values, attitudes of the group to which he is adapting (Belicheva, 1994). The adapting subject may develop his or her own adaptation strategy or may actively influence the social environment by changing its norms and values (Ofitserkina, 1997; Romm, 2002; Melnikova, 1999, etc.). There is an alignment of the subject's needs and pretensions with his or her capabilities, the subject starts to perform new social and interpersonal roles, changes (or develops new) social regulators of behavior (Rozum, 2006). However, a number of authors note the presence of deeper changes occurring in the course of socio-psychological adaptation. A. A. Nalchajian noted that since during socio-psychological adaptation certain adaptive mechanisms are activated, their repeated use in similar social situations leads to the fact that they are fixed in the personality structure and become substructures of its character [54, p. 18]. According to N.S. Khrustaleva, personality traits not only influence the subject's adaptation, but also change themselves in the course of the adaptation process. Particularly important for successful adaptation is a change in the personality's orientation and motivational structure [87, p. 193].
Among the criteria of a person's successful adaptation it is customary to distinguish external (degree of adaptability) and internal (degree of subjective well-being) criteria, however, attempts are made to find a third, systemic criterion that characterizes the interaction of a person and the environment. In our opinion, such criterion can be the level of self-determination of the person in relation to the social environment.
T.A. Vlasova has grouped all these difficulties, dividing them into three main groups:
1 didactic difficulties (work with a large volume of material, independent organization of studies, etc.);
2 socio-psychological difficulties (personal integration with students, acceptance of their values, standards of behavior);
3 professional difficulties (identification with the future professional activity and social role).
Recommendations for students for successful socio-psychological adaptation:
Recommendations to supervisors on social and psychological adaptation of 1st year students:
Comments
No comments